Define service boundaries, integration patterns, data ownership, APIs, and event-driven architecture for cloud-native systems.
We will review your current situation and recommend a practical next step.
Fixed-scope engagement. Final pricing depends on complexity, access, integrations, and timeline.
Companies often attempt to move from monolithic applications to microservices without clear service boundaries, data ownership, integration patterns, or deployment strategy. This can create more complexity instead of solving the original problem.
UCT helps define a realistic microservices architecture roadmap based on business domains, API boundaries, events, data ownership, caching, and cloud deployment patterns.
Designed to provide a practical result quickly, without unnecessary complexity.
No. Microservices are not always the right answer. UCT evaluates whether microservices, modular monolith, APIs, or hybrid patterns are the best fit.
Yes. Service boundary definition is one of the most important parts of the architecture review.
Yes. Kafka and event-driven patterns can be included when they fit the business and technical requirements.
You receive a practical roadmap with recommended service boundaries, integration patterns, risks, and implementation phases.
Book a free discovery call and we will identify the best next step for your business.